Are you fed up with hearing "hormone" is a dirty word? It's enough to drive any Diva stark raving mad! So, pull up a chair and start blogging, 'cause the pharmaceutical/press world is out to control "free radical" women with tranquilizers!

Thursday, December 21, 2006

Potassium Carbonate Better Than Bone Drugs

October 23, 2006 — Twelve-month daily alkali therapy with potassium citrate supplements resulted in a nearly 2% increase in lumbar spine and hip bone mineral density (BMD) in a small randomized controlled trial of postmenopausal women with osteopenia. These results, published in the October issue of the Journal of American Society of Nephrology, suggest that citrate partially reverses the high acidity of the modern Western diet and that this promotes better skeletal health, the researchers, led by Sigrid Jehle, MD, at the Department of Medicine, University of Basel in Bruderholz/Basel, Switzerland, write.

"We showed that BMD was significantly increased in the lumbar spine and the hip after 12 months of a very modest amount of alkali (30 mmol of inexpensive K [potassium] citrate daily) in postmenopausal women with low bone mass (T scores at the lumbar spine of -1 to -4). This was achieved with virtually no side effects."

The women were randomized to receive tablets of potassium citrate or potassium chloride (3 times 10 mmol daily), and all subjects also received calcium carbonate (500 mg of calcium) and 400 IU of vitamin D3 daily. They were instructed to maintain their current eating and exercise habits.

Study Highlights
Inclusion criteria were women who were nonvegetarians, at least 5 years postmenopausal, younger than 70 years of age, and had T scores at lumbar spine L2 to L4 of -1 to -4.

Women were instructed to continue their self-selected diet and exercise regimen. 89 women were randomized to 10 mmol of trivalent potassium citrate in 3 daytime doses, yielding 30 mmol of potassium and 30 mmol of base (bicarbonate) daily, and 92 to 30 mmol of potassium chloride. Both groups received calcium carbonate containing 500 mg of calcium and 400 IU of vitamin D daily.

I've been telling women since 1986, when early FDA studies on bone drugs were compared to the known benefits/response of taking potassium carbonate, that you can achieve the same or BETTER response WITHOUT the side effects of pharmaceutical drugs, simply by taking potassium carbonate. Female Formula Stress Tabs has contained potassium and calcium carbonate since 1986. Hmmm....wonder if Sally Fields knows about this.

Wednesday, May 17, 2006

New Face on the Menopause Diet

Welcome to the new face of the Menopause Diet site. You'll find a ton of articles and lots of recipes going up every week, so be sure and check out
Boomer Babe Articles and Boomer Babe Recipes and take some of my new health Boomer Babe Quizzes. You'll have lots of fun!

Categories: , , , , , , , ,

Saturday, February 18, 2006

Healthsass Blog

Star Lawrence, a well known writer for numerous magazines and websites has started her own health blog and it's SASSY! Check it out at
www.healthsassblogspot.com

Saturday, September 17, 2005

Premarin Unplugged

I was asked, for a news article, if I had any information about WHY Premarin would cause an increased risk for breast cancer, heart disease etc and found this interesting scientific article by chance. I thought I would post it here, as it sure explains a LOT. As you can see, this was a 1997 publication.
Carcinogenesis. 1997 May;18(5):1093-101.
Bioreductive activation of catechol estrogen-ortho-quinones: aromatization of the B ring in 4-hydroxyequilenin markedly alters quinoid formation and reactivity.
Shen L, Pisha E, Huang Z, Pezzuto JM, Krol E, Alam Z, van Breemen RB, Bolton JL.
Department of Medicinal Chemistry and Pharmacognosy (M/C 781), College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago, 60612-7231, USA.
There is a clear association between excessive exposure to estrogens and the development of cancer in several tissues including breast and endometrium. The risk factors for women developing these cancers are all associated with longer estrogen exposure, as may be facilitated by early menses, late menopause and long-term estrogen replacement therapy. Equilenin (1,3,5(10),6,8-estrapentaen-3-ol-17-one) or its 17-hydroxylated analogs make up 15% of the most widely prescribed estrogen replacement formulation, Premarin, and yet there is very little information on the human metabolism of these estrogens. In this study, we synthesized the catechol metabolite of equilenin, 4-hydroxyequilenin, and examined how aromatization of the B ring affects the formation and reactivity of the o-quinone (3,5-cyclohexadien-1,2-dione). 4-Hydroxyequilenin-o-quinone is much more redox-active and longer-lived than the endogenous catechol estrone-o-quinones, which suggests that the mechanism(s) of toxicity of the former could be quite different. Interestingly, the rate of reduction of the 4-hydroxyequilenin-o-quinone is increased at least 13-fold in the presence of NAD(P)H:quinone oxidoreductase (DT-diaphorase). Once NADH is consumed however, the catechol auto-oxidized rapidly to the o-quinone. NADH consumption was accompanied by dicumarol-sensitive oxygen uptake both with the purified enzyme and with cytosol from human melanoma cells with high levels of DT-diaphorase activity. P450 reductase and rat liver microsomes also catalyzed NADPH consumption and oxygen uptake. 4-Hydroxyestrone-o-quinone was also rapidly reduced by NAD(P)H; however, this o-quinone does not auto-oxidize and once the o-quinone is reduced the reaction terminates. Including oxidative enzymes in the incubation completes the redox couple and 4-hydroxyestrone-o-quinone behaves like 4-hydroxyequilenin-o-quinone. These data suggest that reduction of estrogen-o-quinones may not result in detoxification. Instead this could represent a cytotoxic mechanism involving consumption of reducing equivalents (NADH/NADPH) as well as formation of superoxide and other reactive oxygen species leading to oxidative stress. Finally, we have compared the cytotoxicity of 4-hydroxyequilenin with that of the estrone catechols in human melanoma cells. 4-Hydroxyequilenin is 5-fold more toxic in these cells compared with 4-hydroxyestrone (ED50 = 7.8 versus 38 microM, respectively) suggesting that formation of the longer-lived redox-active 4-hydroxyequilenin-o-quinone was responsible for the cytotoxic differences. These results substantiate the conclusion that the involvement of quinoids in catechol estrogen toxicity depends on a combination of the rate of formation of the o-quinone, the lifetime of the o-quinone, and the electrophilic/redox reactivity of the quinoids.
The message? Not all estrogens are metabolized the same, and synthetic ones have many different pathways than natural 17 beta estradiol. Geez, do you think the pharmaceutical development company knew about this? Just look at this earlier study:
Carcinogenesis. 1996 May;17(5):925-9. Related Articles, Links
p-Quinone methides are the major decomposition products of catechol estrogen o-quinones.
Bolton JL, Shen L.
Department of Medicinal Chemistry and Pharmacognosy, College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago, 60612-7231, USA.
The mechanism of catechol estrogen-induced carcinogenesis could involve alkylation of critical cellular macromolecules by electrophilic quinoids. The o-quinones formed from peroxidase/P450-catalyzed oxidation of catechol estrogens have previously been implicated as the ultimate carcinogens. In the present study, we have shown that additional reactive intermediates can be produced from isomerization of the catechol estrogen o-quinones to highly electrophilic p-quinone methides (QMs). The o-quinones of the catechol estrogens were incubated at 37 degrees C (pH 7.4) in the absence of GSH. Aliquots were removed at various times and combined with GSH. The GSH adducts were isolated and characterized by 1H-NMR, UV, and electrospray mass spectrometry. The o-quinone of 2-hydroxyestrone isomerized to two QMs; a QM stabilized by one alkyl substituent in the B ring, 2-OHE-QM1 (3-hydroxy-1-(10),3(4),5(6)-oestratrien-2,17-dione) and one having two alkyl substituents on the methylene group in the C ring, 2-OHE-QM2 (2-hydroxy-1(2),4(5),9(10)-oestratrien-3,17-dione). Only one QM was observed from the o-quinone of 4-hydroxyestrone, 4-OHE-QM2 (4-hydroxy-1(2),4(5),9(10)- oestratrien-3,17-dione) which is analogous to the C ring analog (2-OHE-QM2) from the o-quinone of 2-hydroxyestrone. The GSH adduct of 4-OHE-QM2 decomposed at pH 7.4 to give 9(11)-dehydro-4-hydroxyestrone as the major product. Finally, the disappearance of the estrogen o-quinone GSH adducts correlated with the formation of the GSH conjugates of the QMs. These data suggest that in cells with low levels of GSH, the formation of these potent electrophiles represents the major reaction pathway for estrogen o-quinones. The implications of the o-quinone/QM pathway for the in vivo effects of catechol estrogens are not known; however, given the direct link between excessive exposure to endogenous estrogens and the enhanced risk of breast cancer, the potential for formation of additional reactive intermediates needs to be explored.
Arch Biochem Biophys. 1997 Oct 15;346(2):180-6. Related Articles, Links
Release of iron from ferritin storage by redox cycling of stilbene and steroid estrogen metabolites: a mechanism of induction of free radical damage by estrogen.
Wyllie S, Liehr JG.
Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston 77555-1031, USA.
Estrogens induce hydroxyl radical-mediated DNA and protein damage and lipid peroxidation. As part of a study of the mechanism of hydroxyl radical generation by estrogens, we investigated the in vitro mobilization of Fe2+ from ferritin by redox cycling of the stilbene or steroid estrogen metabolites diethylstilbestrol-4',4"-quinone (DESQ), equilenin-3,4-quinone (EQ), or estrone-3,4-quinone (3,4EQ). Aerobic cytochrome P450 reductase-mediated redox cycling of 35.50 microM DESQ, 0.35 microM EQ, or 3.55 microM 3,4EQ increased the reduction of succinoylated cytochrome c, a measure of superoxide radical formation, by 19-20% over control values (24.5+/-0.3 microM) in the absence of estrogen quinone substrate. Rates of Fe2+ release from horse spleen ferritin by cytochrome P450 reductase-mediated redox cycling of 35.50 microM DESQ, 0.35 microM EQ, or 3.55 microM 3,4EQ were 94.4+/-0.6, 117.2+/-9.4, or 137.7+/-19.9 pmol Fe2+/min, respectively, compared to 67.3 + 2.3 pmol Fe2+/min in the absence of estrogen substrates. Redox cycling of 35.5 microM DESQ, EQ, or 3,4EQ mediated by microsomes of hamster kidney, a target organ of estrogen-induced carcinogenesis, released 511+/-30.10, 516.91+/-22.90, or 410.27+/-28.49 pmol Fe2+/min, respectively. Corresponding values with microsomes of hamster liver, where tumors do not develop by estrogen treatment, were 272.27+/-43.10, 222.25+/-21.78, or 91.36+/-8.54 pmol Fe2-/min, respectively. Diethylstilbestrol, equilenin, and 4-hydroxyestrone do not induce detectable iron release from ferritin under these conditions. The cytochrome P450 reductase-mediated redox cycling of DESQ, EQ, or 3,4EQ in the presence of iron resulted in the hydroxylation of benzoic acid by hydroxyl radical attack. These data demonstrate that redox cycling of estrogen metabolites releases Fe2+ from ferritin, which in turn generates hydroxyl radicals by a Fenton reaction. This estrogen-induced hydroxyl radical damage may contribute to tumor initiation in hormone target tissues, including breast cancer.
There are at least 220 articles about the carcinogenic problems of synthetic estrogens in PubMed...scary isn't it? The press and the medical community simply don't care to understand the difference between natural and synthetic when it comes to making a buck.
Categories: , , , , , ,

The Terminator

No, I'm not talking about that guy who was photographed wearing a speedo with his Buddha Belly hanging over the edge. I'm talking about a Diva whose kitchen was invested with fruit flies!
It all began with a trip to the Santa Monica's Farmers Market. The organic peaches were fuzzy, firm and fragrant;the melons juicy and sweet and the berries so ripe I had to consume mass quantities in the car to prevent them from being bruised by the vibration of the drive. The fruit seduced me into leaving them out on the counter, rather than the fridge, so as not to ruin their wonderful texture. But by morning, I had realized the folly of my ways. The kitchen was boiling with fruit flies.
They mocked me by swarming around the heads of my birds, then landing just inside their cages on the food bowls. They sneared at me from glass-pained cabinet doors before jetting to the top of the ceiling, where they congregated on the light fixutres, high-fiving with their wings. Within hours the room had taken on the humid, frightening feel of the Amazon, complete with sound affects graciously provided by two cockatoos and an African grey.
I felt helpless as I waved my kitchen towel at them. Although I managed to knock down a few, I was eventually overcome by their sheer mass. I was terrified they would begin invading my nostrils, which provoked a snorting fit just in case I was too numb to feel their skillful assault. I cowered in the corner, pulling the dogs nearer. Rhett put his paw on my shoulder in silent tribute, then led Scarlett out the doggie door. Abandoned, I knew it was up to me - and ONLY me - to save us all.
I stood defiantely and marched out to the garage, where I rummaged for an old, retired electric bug zapper, dragging it by it's chord. I plugged it in and behold - white/blue light filled the room. I coyly waved my towel in a circular motion, all the while enticing the flies to "go into the light." My efforts were rewarded with a crackling zap. One down - 999 more to go. I maximized the attraction by turning off all the household lights and closing the windows and doors as I sauntered triumphant out of the room. Four hours later I returned, only to discover their forces had multiplied. Fruit flies are simply too tiny to get caught by the electrified bars. I had failed again. But from disastor comes creativity.
All avian eyes were on me as I dragged a circa 1988 Kenmore canister vacuum into the room. This was no ordinary cleaner, this had a removable wand and hose complete with two power buttons on the handle. I was now armed and dangerous! I laid in wait by the bird cages, watching my prey mass around a seductive piece of sugar melon. Without warning I clicked on the vacuum and sucked those ugly black flies into the dark recesses of the hose. Birds screamed and hit the bottom of their cages, crying a warning to all the Terminator was on the loose. No longer was the ceiling a limit as I attached the extension and swept the lights for more of the enemy. Once the initial assault was successful, I broke my weapon down and holstered it in my pocket. The flies fled to the cabinet doors. Flies are stupid. I merely cupped the nozzle around their flighty little bodies, snapped the button and WHOOSH - they were goners.
I noticed I began to enjoy the kill. I developed several different techniques for ridding the kitchen of these pests, settling on a waving motion, much like fly fishing, to dispatch them to the bowels of the cleaner. Rhett poked his head through the doggie door, then motioned for Scarlet to join him. Everyone likes to watch a professional at work. Within the next 20 minutes I had devastated the population. Birds flapped their wings in applause while Rhett and Scarlet took shelter behind my legs. Vacuums and dogs make for such cowards! But now I could rest. As for the flies, they WON'T be back!

FDA WARNS DIABETES AND ANTIPSYCHOTIC MEDS

Clinical & Research News
FDA to Require Diabetes Warning On Antipsychotics Jim Rosack Choosing to sidestep the issue of differences in weight gain among the different medications, the new warnings appear to put the entire class on equal footing for risk of diabetes.
In a series of letters delivered in mid-September, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) disclosed to makers of atypical antipsychotic medications that it will require each drug maker to relabel its product to include warnings regarding risk of hyperglycemia and diabetes mellitus.
Communications between the FDA and drug makers are usually considered privileged and proprietary—those considered to be sensitive are rarely disclosed. However, the receipt of the letters was made public by Eli Lilly and Co., maker of olanzapine (Zyprexa).
The makers of each of the other atypical antipsychotics, clozapine (Novartis’s Clozaril), risperidone (Janssen’s Risperdal), quetiapine (AstraZeneca’s Seroquel), ziprasidone (Pfizer’s Geodon), and aripiprazole (Bristol-Myers Squibb/Otsuka’s Abilify) all confirmed to Psychiatric News the receipt of similar letters requesting the new warning language. None, however, was willing to make copies of its letter available.
The Lilly letter was disclosed in a press release and posted on the company’s Web site.
The FDA letter to Lilly, signed by Russell Katz, M.D., director of the agency’s Division of Neuropharmacological Drug Products, noted that "after reviewing the available data pertaining to the use of atypical antipsychotic medications and diabetes mellitus adverse events, we have concluded that the product labeling for all atypical antipsychotics should be updated to include information about these events."
The letter continued, "While we acknowledge that the relationship between atypical antipsychotic use and diabetes mellitus adverse events has not been completely described," the agency will require all atypicals to carry the broad new warnings (see box on page 26 for the agency’s proposed language for the warnings). "Increased attention to the signs and symptoms of diabetes mellitus may lead to earlier detection and appropriate treatment and thus reduce the risk for the most serious outcomes," the letter advised.
The public release of the letter by Lilly was considered a bold move by pharmaceutical-industry analysts, who regarded the FDA warnings as controversial and having significant potential to alter prescribing patterns. Olanzapine, analysts noted, is tied to reports of weight gain and diabetes more often than are other atypical antipsychotics.
The issue is certainly not a new one. Case reports of diabetes and diabetic complications associated with atypical antipsychotics have been known for many years. However, significant debate has occurred in both the research and clinical arenas as to how strong the association is, and what factors—if any—are likely to predict which patients will be at increased risk.
One central issue in the controversy is the role played by weight gain as a factor in increasing a patient’s risk for developing diabetes. Endocrinologists have long held that obesity is a key factor increasing the risk of diabetes in the general population. A significant body of epidemiological research has attempted to answer the question in patients taking antipsychotics, with somewhat conflicting results.
Many psychiatrists familiar with the issue now believe that weight gain fostered by antipsychotic medications does play a central role in elevating the risk of diabetes in their patients.
"Both case-report literature and published FDA MedWatch analyses indicate that about 75 percent of the cases of new-onset type II diabetes associated with drugs like clozapine and olanzapine occur in the setting of obesity and substantial weight gain," said John Newcomer, M.D., an associate professor of psychiatry at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis.
"That leaves 25 percent, though," Newcomer told Psychiatric News, "who develop diabetes without weight gain, and these are the difficult cases to figure out."
Newcomer has published several research studies on the risk of diabetes in patients taking atypical antipsychotics.
Several studies have indicated that patients gain the most weight on olanzapine and clozapine, while patients taking risperidone and quetiapine gain less. Patients taking ziprasidone or aripiprazole generally do not gain weight, and may even lose weight.
While cases of diabetes have been reported among patients taking all of the six medications in question, some studies indicate that the highest number of cases appears to be in patients taking olanzapine and clozapine.
Olanzapine maker Lilly several years ago acknowledged that weight gain is a known risk factor for diabetes and began a line of research geared to help patients reduce the amount of weight they gain while on the drug—either through pharmacological means or via diet and exercise. Some data have been published that suggest that weight gain can be limited in patients with schizophrenia taking olanzapine.
FDA’s Stance
"The FDA was in a very difficult position," Newcomer noted. If the agency had done nothing, it would have been accused of being nonresponsive. If the FDA ordered selective labeling—only certain drugs within the class—then the agency "would really have been on the spot to justify that position."
In ordering warnings across the entire class of atypicals, however, Newcomer believes the agency may have been trying for the middle ground—not wanting to single out one medication. Yet by avoiding the weight issue, he said, the FDA appears to have caught the ire of a number of specialists familiar with the issue.
"Clearly, the NIH [and] the [American Diabetes Association] say that weight gain is a major risk factor for diabetes mellitus and that it should be watched. Yet there is little mention of it in the FDA warning," Newcomer said.
In addition, he maintains that the warning could have been more specific on what physicians should do if a patient develops serious diabetic complications, as well as how patients taking atypical antipsychotic medications should be monitored to catch any impairment in glucose control early. Newcomer also believes that "the FDA could have identified that there are differences in short- and long-term weight gain among the individual medications that are already detailed in the package inserts and should be considered as part of monitoring and treatment decisions."
Looking for Answers
In its letter to Lilly, the FDA "acknowledge[s] that additional labeling changes may be required as new information becomes available. Areas that require additional research include, but are not limited to, identification of subpopulations at greatest risk for diabetes mellitus adverse events, exploration of the relative risk for diabetes mellitus adverse events among the different antipsychotics, and evaluation of potential mechanisms of action."
Each of the companies involved continues to pursue these and other research questions in an attempt to resolve the issue, and most of the companies told Psychiatric News that they will review the requested labeling changes and work out final language with the FDA.
Endocrinologists are intimately involved in attempting to answer key questions as well. The American Diabetes Association (ADA) has scheduled a November 19 consensus development conference to address the relationship between antipsychotic medications and diabetes.
Newcomer is a member of the ADA consensus panel’s planning committee. (He noted that the final consensus committee will be made up of endocrinologists and senior psychiatrists who—like himself—have no research or financial interest in the companies that make the medications at issue.) The ADA conference is currently targeted at primary care physicians and endocrinologists, Newcomer said, who have not yet heard much about the diabetes problems that psychiatric patients are encountering. However, the results of the conference will have obvious relevance beyond those fields.
APA is also working on the issue, having established an antipsychotics and diabetes subcommittee under the Corresponding Committee on Research on Psychiatric Treatments. Newcomer also is on this subcommittee.
"What remains to be seen is whether the ADA comes out with a consensus statement that is in line with or different from the FDA’s language," Newcomer said. "Will there be any clarity to the monitoring and treatment recommendations? APA’s subcommittee will watch this very closely and will be in a position to add to or clarify the ADA statement, so that we get the most accurate and complete information out in a timely manner."
The FDA’s letter to Lilly is posted on the Web at E Lilly Letter
Now, you know I've been warning women about antidpressants, now the new vogue for treating menopausal symtpoms, causing insulin resistance, but so far, no warning like this has been requested by the FDA. Wonder how many years THAT one is going to take? Probably as long as it takes them to figure out 17 beta estradiol is NOT the same as conjugated estrogens!
Categories: , , , , , , , ,
,

Women Yawn Their Way Into Heart Attacks

It's not bad enough women are much more efficient at sucking out carbs and storing them as fat than men, but now a new study has found we have a completely different "warning" mechanism before a heart attack occurs. Dr. Jean McSweeny used her Acute and Prodromal Myocardial Infarction Symptom Survey, and discovered the most frequently reported prodromal symptom of a heart attack in women was unusual fatigue, difficulty sleeping and shortness of breath. Only 30% reported chest pain, a hallmark of an impending MI in men. Women had more acute symptoms ( meaning they had less of a lead time than men ) and their symptoms occured more frequently and intensely than men's.In The Menopause Diet, I have discussed how sleep changes can increase your risk for a heart attack by raising insulin levels. This study helps to clarify why so many women are sent home from the ER only to suffer fatal heart attacks because their symptoms did not fit the "typical MALE profile."If you want to read the full study, just send off an email with the subject heart to Diva@hormonediva.com and I'll send you a PDF file of the study.I'm interested in hearing your opinions on this study, so let me know!
Categories: , , , , , , , , ,

When are "bio-identical hormones" worth $3500?

The answer is NEVER, but you wouldn't believe that if you read the article in the Southwest Airlines flight magazine this month. It featured a male physician who claims he is a "feminist" because he only treats women with bio-identical hormones. As you read through this slick article, you discover he accepts cash only, no insurance payments, and claims an 85% success rate...at what I'm not sure, unless it's collections! The average cost for his therapy? $1800-3500 for his exclusive "bio-identical" formulas.
The article goes on to state that "every woman has a 50% drop in energy levels by age 50" which he claims is due to a decline in thyroid hormone production, but feels blood tests don't tell him how much thyroid hormone to give. So, he treats EVERY woman with thyroid, progesterone, cortisol, a little estrogen ( he doesn't state WHAT kind..estradiol, estriol, estrone and in what format, but heh, let's not get picky here for that price!)...and a slew of vitamins along with 5HTP, melatonin. He claims bio-identical hormones are not patentable...so therefore no drug company provides them, only counterfeit hormones. Gee...I guess all those 17 beta-estradiol and estriol and estrone products are phonier than a $3 bill! He has NO clinical studies ( he does "outcome based studies" which means they are anecdotal) and has no blood levels to follow his therapy.
It was a good thing the "fasten seat belt" sign was on as I read this article, or I would have hit the ceiling! It's an outrage that a physician would make such false claims in order to prey upon women's fear of hormones at present. His ignorance and hutzpah are only matched by his billings and I hesitate at how much damage this hormone program will wreck on unsuspecting women looking for the "fountain of youth."
Bio-identical hormones have been available for more than 10 years, and are patented under the format of delivery aspect...a little something this doc seems to have no clue about! Creams cannot deliver 17 beta-estradiol across the dermis because the molecule is just too damn large! It takes an alcohol gel or a microsphere or a dializing membrane to do it, but you can also swallow it. And for every drug you take, there is a LAB TEST to determine it's absorption and response in your body, because that is a requirement for FDA approval. However, creams and witches brews sold over the counter ( talk about counterfeit drugs!) have no such standards. As discussed in my newsletter Larrian Reports and in my books, most of these products, when put to a standardization test, have little or no hormone in them to start!
So when is "bio-identical" hormone therapy worth $3500? When cows can fly!
Categories: , , , , , , , ,

Soy Supplements Increase Breast Cancer

This study puts another nail in the soy supplement coffin as an effective way to lower the risk of breast cancer. Highly purified soy foods and supplements marketed in the US may stimulate the growth of pre-existing estrogen-dependent breast tumors according to Professor William Helferich. " In Asia, soy foods are made from minimally processed soybeans or defatted, toasted soy flour, which is quite different from soy products consumed in the US. Isoflavone-containing products in the US have lost many of the biologically active components in soy, and those partially purified products,(which contain concentrated genistein) sold as supplements, caused tumor growth in our study."
What's the moral here? Don't tamper with Mother Nature! When the mice were fed soy flour with MIXED isoflavone content (which is more like the Asian diet) there was no increase in tumor growth. It's all in the processing and isolation to make a more expensive product. So use soy flour and leave the supplements alone.
But if that wasn't enough, look what happens when you take soy supplements and tamoxifen, the drug used to treat breast cancer. Dr. Helferich went on to look at this same isoflavone, Genistein, and found it enhanced the growth of estrogen-dependent breast cancer, the most common type found in women over 50. But the scary news was discovering isoflavone supplements prevented tamoxifen from stopping tumor growth. Blood concentrations of genistein were similar to levels found in people taking isoflavone supplements. "Self-medicating with soy supplements to prevent menopausal symptoms while undergoing chemotherapy interefered with tamoxifen's benefits."
I'll take this one step further. The mass marketing of refined soy products to women as a "natural, safe" alternative to estrogen therapy will result in an ever increasing rate of breast cancer if women don't reign in their fear of "hormones" and understand that "natural" means 17-beta estradiol.
You can find the medical articles in my free newsletter Larrian Reports
Categories: , , , , , , , , ,

Progestins Produce Negative Emotional Effects

A new study on the emotional affects of progestins has demonstrated some serious concerns, according to researcher Dr. Karen Pazol. Using macaques, they proved that progestins increased anxiety, aggression and inhibited sexual responsiveness in females even when given with estrogen. "Medroxyprogesterone acetate (this is the chemical progestin marketed as Provera) binds to glucocorticoid receptors with a much higher affinity and may have an impact on the brain's stress system." says Dr. Pazol. Unlike natural progesterone, MPA (or any synthetic progestin) cannot be converted to the mood-regulating chemical, allopregnanolone. Low levels of this neurochemical result in depression, anxiety and PMS disorders in humans.
So, what is this really saying? You don't need me to tell you all the BAD things about MPA and synthetic progestins if you've been reading this blog or my newsletter for any time, but it does raise a rather interesting sociological question: Could birth control pills and HRT affect social relationships in a NEGATIVE manner, damaging marriages? Have women been manipulated chemically to become their own evil twin?
Categories: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Wednesday, August 27, 2003

Low Dose Estradiol Does It Again!

Well, for ONCE they are starting to get the picture! Studies are showing up using 17 beta estradiol INSTEAD of conjugated estrogens and look at this! Women who used .025mg 17 beta estradiol daily only took progesterone orally every 6 months for 14 days, had an increase in bone mineral density at the hip, spine, wrist and total body. There were no reports of breast cancer ( they followed them for 3 years..remember the scare tactics about using estrogen for 3 years..I mean, premarin....and breast cancer) and no cases of endometrial hyperplasia. But if you listened to the press, this report was barely mentioned. Could it be it flies in the face of the hysteria they are creating about hormones, breast cancer, uterine cancer and the like? Nah, they wouldn't do that to us now, would they?

Ultralow-Dose Micronized 17-Estradiol and Bone Density and Bone Metabolism in Older Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Karen M. Prestwood; Anne M. Kenny; Alison Kleppinger; Martin Kulldorff
JAMA. 2003;290:1042-1048
Categories: , , , , , , , , ,

Chocolate Better Than Wine!

Okay, it's a bit of a stretch, but new research has shown that consuming DARK chocolate contains the same if not more of the compounds found in red wine -polyphenols-which can lower your blood pressure. Hmmm...those little Dove dark chocolate pieces are so good, especially when they get warmed up a bit in this weather. Granted, chocolate won't give you a buzz like wine, but when you include dark chocolate and potassium rich foods in your diet, such as fruit or chilis, you can drop several notches in your BP. I did my own experiment and found my BP and pulse dropped almost 7 points systolic after eating a Dove bar. The study was published in JAMA (Chocolate and Blood Pressure in Elderly Individuals With Isolated Systolic Hypertension
Dirk Taubert; Reinhard Berkels; Renate Roesen; Wolfgang Klaus JAMA. 2003;290:1029-1030.)
Categories: , , , , , , , ,

Tuesday, August 26, 2003

Welcome to my new blog.
~Prozac On The Couch: How to Control Women as "Free Radicals"-
So, let me get started on my rant which I promised you at the beginning of this newsletter. In an interesting but not well written book called "Prozac on the Couch: Prescribing Gender in the Era of Wonder Drugs" by Jonathan Metzl, one gets a peak into the gender relations of psychiatry and the impact of pharmaceutical ads, popular press and professional journals on the treatment of women. Miltown, or meprobamate, was dispensed to control women's discontent with their treatment by society, which caused their anxiety and threatened, like "free radicals" to tear apart the relationships between men and women. Tranquilizers were the "restorative cure" which conventional "talk" psychiatry couldn't offer.
So look at what is happening in the pharmaceutical/press world today when it comes to hormones. They have made "hormone" a dirty word, shifting blame and responsibility onto women for their marketing and hidden side effects. All you have to do is look at how eagerly doctors are willing to prescribe SSRI's, in place of estrogen to "calm" women down, to see where this is all going. Women need to take control of their own hormonal health and not let the "industry" of medicine ruin the quality of our lives and that of our families. Otherwise, we are looking at another decade of "valium now SSRI" addicts, and it's not a pretty sight. But I could be wrong.
Categories: , , , , ,